Old Grammar Rules We Don’t Follow Anymore

Krystal DeVille

Updated on:

Women with a book glasses.

Language is a living entity, evolving and shifting with the sands of time. As society changes, so do the ways we communicate. In the annals of the English language, many grammar rules that were once deemed sacrosanct have now faded into obscurity. Let’s take a nostalgic journey back in time and explore some of these old grammar guidelines that we’ve gracefully let go of in modern discourse. Welcome to “Old Grammar Rules We Don’t Follow Anymore!

Splitting Infinitives is Forbidden

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

The old rule stated that one should never split an infinitive (to + verb). For example, “to boldly go” was considered incorrect. Today, most grammarians agree that avoiding split infinitives can make sentences sound awkward or overly formal.

Ending a Sentence with a Preposition

It was once frowned upon to end a sentence with a preposition. However, doing so can make speech sound more natural, and it’s widely accepted in modern English.

Starting a Sentence with “And” or “But”

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

Traditionally, starting a sentence with conjunctions like “and” or “but” was seen as informal. Today, it’s recognized as a way to create emphasis or continuity in writing.

“Ain’t” Ain’t a Word

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

While “ain’t” was once considered slang and improper, it’s now included in dictionaries and can be seen in various forms of literature and speech.

Double Negatives are a No-No

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

In Old and Middle English, double negatives were standard. Over time, they became associated with uneducated speech. However, they’re still prevalent in many dialects and have a place in artistic expression.

“They” as Singular

stressed woman office worker.
Image Credit: JumpStory

Using “they” as a singular pronoun was once criticized. Today, it’s widely accepted, especially as a gender-neutral pronoun.

“Whom” in Objective Cases

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

While “whom” is technically correct in objective cases, it’s often seen as formal and old-fashioned. Many people use “who” in everyday speech and writing, regardless of the case.

Avoiding Contractions in Writing

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

Contractions like “can’t,” “won’t,” or “it’s” were once seen as too informal for serious writing. Now, they’re embraced for making prose sound more conversational and accessible.

“Over” vs. “More Than”

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

It was once taught that “over” should indicate spatial relationships and “more than” should indicate numerical relationships. This distinction has largely been abandoned, and both terms are used interchangeably.

The Prohibition of “Like” as a Conjunction

Image Credit: Deposit Photos

Using “like” as a conjunction (e.g., “It felt like I was dreaming”) was once considered colloquial. While some purists still avoid it today, it’s widely accepted in everyday language.

Leave a Comment